Conformity Assessment Criteria (CaC) – CX-0156 Geometry
This table defines the conformity assessment criteria for the Catena-X Geometry Standard (CX-0156-Geometry v1.0.0), following the structure described in the Guidance CAC Consolidation document. The test procedure columns are marked with 'X' where applicable for each criterion.
| Standard (CX-0156) | CaCID | Requirement | MUST/MAY/SHOULD | Inspection | Observation | Self-assessment | Inquiry | Confirmation | Recalculation | Reperformance | Analytical Procedures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CX-0156-Geometry | CaC-1 | Geometry data must be attached to the digital twin as a submodel. | MUST | X | |||||||
| CX-0156-Geometry | CaC-2 | Geometry data may be attached via digital master data (CX-0154). | MAY | X | |||||||
| CX-0156-Geometry | CaC-3 | Geometry data may be attached via PartType. | MAY | X | |||||||
| CX-0156-Geometry | CaC-4 | Geometry data should be validated against JSON payload and should comply with JSON schema. | SHOULD | X |
Note: All criteria marked as "MUST" in the standard are mandatory for conformity. Additional recommendations (e.g., use of
digitalTwinType) may be included as best practices but are not required for conformity assessment.
Legal
Copyright © 2025 Catena-X Automotive Network e.V. All rights reserved. For more information, please visit here.